lazy?
I
recently read a fellow student�s comments in a culture class I�m currently
in.� The train of thought going on was
that of other cultures and how children in other countries work from an early
age and how some people think that American children are lazy.� The topic has mostly been on
I pointed
out to some in class that my son would love to have a job and could do a great
job in many places, but is too young by American law
to work.� He is however not lazy.
Someone
else pointed out that American children are lazy because they don�t have to
work in order to eat.
And then
it happened�..some other assclown said the following:
>I definately
agree the work ethic of children today seems to be lacking.
> The chldren of those cultures work because if
they don't they don't eat.
> That's how it works in my house, you don't do your work, you don't eat.
I
responded to her as follows:
Not feeding your children is
considered to be child abuse in some cultures regardless of your reasons.
A woman recently got arrested in
I'm sure in other countries this
activity might be acceptable and even overlooked. Discipline matters are
private in some places. But not in others. She's
in jail tonight.
I have
never sent my son to bed without dinner.�
I have never insisted he eat all of his dinner and I have never used
food as punishment or discipline.� I
think it�s wrong.
What do
you think after reading this entry?